Kotok Am Sigish

Contents • • • • • • • To Do [ ] IMHO needs more work at least on,,,, and significance of DEC machines after the PDP-6. Also somewhere in Wikipedia, a screen shot from Spacewar! Running on the Computer History Museum's restored PDP-1 would be great (the phosphors give the ships tails). -- 15:15, 12 June 2006 (UTC) • Spacewar! Photo added 21 July 04:58, 29 August 2006 (UTC) • W3C at Stata Center added 26 December 07:06, 29 December 2006 (UTC) Alan B.

Kotok_am_sigish,:-[[[, magazin_apelsin_dmitrov,. Am Kotok, 33 years, Kyrgyzstan, Uzgen, Wamba. Was online long ago. 33 years, Sagittarius. Kyrgyzstan, Uzgen. Send a message. Tamil to arabic dictionary pdf online.

Kotok [ ] Someday this entry should mention and link to a separate page for Alan B. - 22:00, 13 June 2006 (UTC) • Mention added at the top. -- 11:04, 17 June 2006 (UTC) Sketchpad [ ] In the Computer History Museum video celebrating the PDP-1 restoration, there is a mention of T-Square possibly being the 'first electronic drafting' program, and that it used the Spacewar! Apparently first ran in February 1962. In his MIT PhD thesis published in 1963, Ivan Sutherland explains he completed an early version of that could draw parallel and perpendicular lines in November 1961. Sutherland goes on to say, 'Somewhat before my first effort was working, Welden Clark of Bolt, Beranek and Newman.'

Garmin how to unlock maps hack. Also, link to files that would help if appreciated.. I guess the first step would be to analyse the firmware packages (Are there encrypted?). #1 priorty is to port over android wear FENIX 3 information - Fenix 3 - to do list - Unlock - Create custom os or port android wear - Unlock ability to add custom maps or navigation - Unlock additional on board storage FENIX 3 Links - Base OS files - none at this time, current version is 3.4 Actual download to the Garmin Connect IQ SDK - SDK Developer tools / api - Please Post or start discussions on upgrading these babies!!!!! I'd be good to consider also supporting the fenix 3 HR (i wouldn't be suprised if there were onlys minor differences for the internal HR sensor support) I have no clue how i can help; I've never done any reverse engineering (I'm no electronics nerd, and certainly won't be opening up and messing around with my $600 watch), but I'll be closely following, testing stuff (if it doesn't brick the watch) and maybe learn some low level stuff on the way.

Showed him a 'similar program' running on a PDP-1. It would be interesting to know what program that was. -- 10:17, 17 June 2006 (UTC) • Paragraph saying relationship is 'unknown' copied to new stub. Clark's publications might or might not hold an answer. -- 22:27, 27 December 2006 (UTC) Good luck [ ] I've made a few tweaks, but that is all I plan to do for now. If you need a copyeditor before the next GAN, feel free to let me know (I'm not a very good one, but I understand the context and am at least another pair of eyes).

21:41, 8 February 2009 (UTC) Geometry guy! If you are serious about offering to copyedit, you lifted my spirits. One source left in question:.

Do you think that the direct quote there could be allowed at GAN (and FAC)? It explains several years of the subject's life and could be a primary source. Samizdat.com is probably as old as Google but some people might call it self-published. - () 05:49, 9 February 2009 (UTC) I've done a bit more and a bit less than copyedit. More because I've removed some content that seemed to me to be tangential. Less because I think more copyediting work may be needed. However, a priority right now should be.

The current lead is very weak and needs to be expanded to 2-3 paragraphs which touch on the main points of the article. I don't mind giving it a shot this weekend, but I need to be sure I have understood the main points, hence my copyediting++. As for the source, I'm not sure: in my view the reliability of a source should be judged in the context of the material that is being sourced. In this case it is pretty factual, so some leniency is OK. You can ask at the for other opinions. 23:55, 11 February 2009 (UTC) The lead is better now.

Also I cut some details that couldn't be cited. If you think it is ready say go. - () 03:19, 13 February 2009 (UTC) I would suggest renomination now. There may still be GA concerns, but given your willingness to fix issues raised, and the closeness of the article to the GA standard, there's a good chance that you'll get a review with a positive outcome. 23:27, 14 February 2009 (UTC) GA Review [ ] This review is from.

The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review. I'll be reviewing this article for GA status, and should have the full review up shortly. () 18:59, 24 February 2009 (UTC) review (see for criteria) • It is reasonably well written. A (prose): b (): • The lead could use some expansion.